Kishen Bilagali responds to Peacock-feather controversy: Being an influencer, I don't want to be known for the wrong reasons
Bigg
Boss Kannada fame, dancer and influencer Kishen Bilagali has issued a
public apology amid the controversy surrounding the use of a
peacock-feather costume, acknowledging that he was unaware that renting
such outfits could also violate wildlife protection norms.
In a video shared on social media, Bilagali explained that the idea for the costume stemmed from seeing peacock feathers being used in various cultural and religious settings since childhood.
"I have seen the usage of peacock feathers since childhood in many places, fancy dress competitions, Krishna Janmashtami celebrations, dargahs, and many other places. When I thought of the concept, Peacock dance, I felt we could simply rent it," he said.
According to Bilagali, the costume was obtained from a rental vendor through a collaboration. However, after a complaint was filed and legal concerns were raised, he said he was informed that even renting such costumes could be problematic under wildlife protection regulations.
"We were not aware of it. When the legal notice was served, the entire team was very supportive and explained the Wildlife Protection Act and the possible consequences," he said, thanking forest officials for educating him on the issue.
Kishen said he and his team immediately removed the video from social media after learning about the legal implications.
"Being an influencer, I don't want to be known for the wrong reasons. We have pulled down the video because we were informed that renting a peacock-feather costume is also wrong," he stated.
Appealing to the public, Kishen urged parents and event organisers not to encourage the use of such costumes, even for children's fancy-dress events.
"I request everyone not to encourage renting peacock feathers, even for your kids' fancy dress competitions. Let us try to preserve our animals and forests. Let us not misuse peacock feathers," he said.
Concluding his statement, Kishen offered an unconditional apology to those offended by the incident. "If anyone feels it was my mistake to rent the costume, I am truly sorry. My sincere apologies," he said.
The clarification comes after a complaint was filed with the Forest Department seeking an inquiry into the alleged use of real peacock feathers in costumes worn by Bilagali and social media personality Niveditha Gowda. Forest authorities are yet to announce whether a formal investigation has been initiated.
Bigg Boss Kannada fame Niveditha Gowda and Kishan Bilagali face legal trouble over viral Peacock feather costumes; Complaint filed under the Wildlife Protection Act
Kannada
reality show Bigg Boss fame Niveditha Gowda and dancer-influencer
Kishan Bilagali have landed in legal trouble following allegations
related to the use of costumes made from real peacock feathers. The
controversy erupted after the duo reportedly shared reels and videos on
social media while wearing outfits allegedly crafted using natural
peacock feathers.
A formal complaint has been filed with the Forest Department against both celebrities. Social activist Dinesh Kallahalli submitted a written complaint to the forest officials of the Kaggalipura Forest Range under the Bengaluru Urban Division, urging authorities to conduct an immediate investigation into the matter.
According to the complaint, the use and display of costumes made from real peacock feathers may violate wildlife protection laws, as the Indian peafowl is a protected species under Indian legislation. The complainant has requested the Forest Department to verify the authenticity and source of the feathers used in the outfits and determine whether any legal provisions have been breached.
The issue has sparked discussion on social media, with many users calling for stricter enforcement of wildlife protection regulations. Forest officials are yet to issue an official statement regarding the complaint or confirm whether a formal inquiry has been initiated.
As the matter gains public attention, all eyes are now on the Forest Department's next course of action and whether further legal proceedings will follow against the two social media personalities.
0 comments: